“Of course, criticism of Israeli government policy is not in and of itself necessarily anti-Semitic. But what else can we call criticism that selectively condemns only the Jewish state (…). This is the face of the new anti-Semitism. It targets the Jewish people by targeting Israel.”
– Stephen Harper, Israeli Knesset, January 20th 2014
“Canada has taken a zero-tolerance approach to anti-Semitism and all forms of discrimination (…) towards Israel, and attempts to delegitimize Israel such as the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement.”
– Stephen Blaney, UN General Assembly, January 22, 2015
Mr. Harper and many of his ministers have repeatedly threatened those who “single out” Israel for criticism. It feels like a campaign of intimidation. OK I give up! I will stop doing it. Read why (and how…)
Mr. Harper and his government appear to be trying to stop what appears to be a rising tide of criticism of Israel. In doing so, they enthusiastically adopt the position of the Israeli government and of the Israel lobby in Canada.
A special target appears to be The BDS movement (which proposes a boycott of Israel). The BDS demand to “end the occupation’ is a big annoyance to Israel. But the other two demands of the BDS movement, (that for equality for non-Jews living inside Israel, and for a just solution for the refugees) are especially bothersome because they put into question the legitimacy of the very idea of a State for Jews.
While Mr. Harper has not yet mentioned any specific threats, let alone laid any charges, it is clear that he is throwing down the gauntlet. The intent seems to be to ‘chill” criticism of Israel in Canada by scaring those who are concerned.
Faced with possible unknown consequences, I have decided to give up. Therefore, I promise that henceforth I will not single Israel out for special criticism.
Instead, I promise to focus my attention on criticizing any states which have these ten characteristics:
- Was founded based on a UN resolution but ended up taking over much more land than that proposed by that same resolution,
- In addition, ignored the part of that UN resolution which specified that the rights of the indigenous population would be protected.
- Followed that up by a massive operation of ethnic cleansing of civilian populations which included several massacres
- Has confiscated the lands and homes of those expelled and refuses any guilt or even any offer of reparation.
- Refuses to allow its former citizens to return solely because they are not of a specified religion.
- Ignores repeated resolutions of the United Nations calling for their right to return in line with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
- Claims to be a democracy, yet by law discriminates, or permits discrimination, against a significant minority of its own population based on religion or ethnicity
- Continues to build housing on illegally occupied land, in violation of article 4 of the Geneva Convention
- Holds several thousand political prisoners, including more than a dozen elected parliamentarians of the subjugated people
- Has a secret nuclear weapons program and refuses to allow international inspection or even sign a non-proliferation treaty.
Mr. Harper and Mr. Blaney, I am sure you would agree that any country that even comes close to this description would be very far from from Canadian values of fairness, equality, democracy, respect for human rights, etc.
Of course, I know there is lots of evil in this world. But compared to the resources at your disposal, my knowledge is limited. In order to relieve any confusion in my mind, and to make absolutely sure that I am in your good books, I would invite you to ask your staff to prepare and make public a list of “criticizable” countries based on these, or similar criteria.
Once identified, I would happily join you in encouraging the Canadian government, and the whole Canadian population, to support and encourage a program of boycott, divestment and sanctions against any such place.
Peter,This is superb. congratulations. I am forwarding it to others.Ayse
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 01:40:14 +0000 To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Well said and presented Peter! Very strong argument! Regards. Peacelover Ottawa
This is CANADA, Where its constitution concedes of “The Liberty of Speech”.
Not YOU who gives up !
Not YOU, the great leader and great steadfast supporter of the Palestinian human Rights.
Not YOU, who is purpose.
YOUR continued effort for our cause, will be always recognized and appreciated.
YOU ARE A GREAT MAN PETER.
There is a song traditionally sung on the Jewish Holiday of Passover. Its title is Dayenu (דַּיֵּנוּ) It tells of the 15 things that the Hebrew’s god did for them (or to the Egyptians). After each of these things the verse says “Dayenu” or “It would have been enough”. While I did not really like that song (as it celebrated some hateful things done to innocent people), I think that the verse applies here. After each of your ten points, I would add “Dayenu” or “It would have been enough”. In other words, you can criticize any country that did even one of those things. Ten is far more than enough.
Excellent article! 10 points that no one can argue against, no one that believes in Human rights that is.
Excellent article Peter, I thank you for highlighting the above mentioned points in order for the Canadian to know the truth .
As a Canadian, I believe this is an excellent and fair argument to criticize Israel and put pressure on it. At the same, we should encourage criticism of regimes in the Middle East that have committed similar atrocities such as the Syrian, Saudi and Iranian regimes. This does not diminish the value of criticizing Israel. On the contrary, this makes it more solid especially that Israel has been a good secret partner of some of these regimes especially the Saudi.
I also will join in criticism of the countries which Harper and his cronies will come up, after a study, to find out which countries do the listed crimes. Meantime I’ll continue criticizing the one state which does all listed crimes. I don’t think anyone has difficulty naming this country.
Brilliant piece Peter!! With change like we see in Alberta can Ottawa and Israel be far behind??.
Sent from my iPad
Comments are closed.