“A total outrage against a fragile city,” says Haifa-born architect Moshe Safdie, of a proposed cable-car for Jerusalem. The cable car project is promoted by Israeli settler groups who want to reinforce the Jewish presence in East Jerusalem. It would allow visitors to visit Jewish sites without encountering Arabs. It has faced opposition not only from Palestinians whose neighbourhoods will be defaced, but also from many Jews both inside and outside Israel. Read more.
A proposed cable car, announced by Israel’s tourism minister Yariv Levin in the runup to last April’s election, has provoked apprehension among Palestinian Jerusalemites, and horror in the architectural and conservation communities. Thirty-five leading international architects and historians have joined their colleagues and conservation societies in Israel to express their vehement opposition to the project.
Among those expressing opposition is famed Moshe Safdie, an 83 year old Canadian-Israeli born in Mandate Palestine before the creation of the state of Israel. “The cable car is (…) flashy, vulgar and aggressive,” he told the New York Times. “Its aggression suggests not strength, but insecurity and weakness.” In another interview, he declared “A cable car system, running close to the Old City walls …will provide a precedent that, without doubt, will spark international opposition and criticism.”
Those reservations about the project join formal objections submitted by Palestinian residents of the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Silwan – over whose homes the cable car will run – as well as by architects, tour guides and archaeologists, noting the material damage the project would cause and exposing its political motivations.
The Palestinians have found an important ally in Michael Kimmelman, architecture critic for the New York Times. Kimmelman argued in a front page NYT column that the idea behind the cable car is above all a political project. It promotes a Zionist worldview promoting “a specifically Jewish narrative of Jerusalem, furthering Israeli claims over Arab parts of the city” he wrote.
“The idea behind the cable car is above all political in nature… with the purpose of hiding the city’s universal character, so that it curates a specifically Jewish narrative of Jerusalem, furthering Israeli claims over Arab parts of the city.”
Michael Kimmelman, NYT Architecture Critic
“Arabs will supposedly benefit from using the cable car,” Jawad Siyam, a Palestinian resident of Silwan, told Ha’aretz. “But the cable car is not about solving problems for us. It’s about creating them.”
Mr. Siyam maintains that if Israeli authorities really want to benefit Arab residents, they should repair the busy, rutted, narrow, dangerous, often impassable road that is the only way in or out of Silwan for thousands of Palestinian residents.
The project would in fact create new barriers to Palestinian access, in addition to the expropriations and demolitions of Palestinian properties required to build it. If constructed, the Palestinians of Silwan would find themselves in the unique situation of facing Israeli occupation, not only on all sides, but above and below as well as “City of David” excavations are actually digging tunnels under Silwan.
It remains to be seen if the cable car will ever see the light of day. It has significant backers among extremist religious groups and the Israeli government has designated it a “national infrastructure project,” limiting the public’s ability to object.
But according to Haaretz, it has also created a broad opposition movement including architects, conservationists and of course, the Palestinians, who see yet another step in Israel’s attempt to “judaize” Jerusalem by converting a multicultural and multireligious city into an overwhelmingly Jewish one.
Canada Talks Israel Palestine (CTIP) aims to promote a serious discussion in Canada about the complicated and emotional Israel/Palestine issue. If you support our educational mission, why not join? Or make a donation? Or learn more about what we do? Contact us at: email@example.com.