Recognition of Palestine by Canada has opened a crack in the door

On July 30th Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that Canada would recognize the State of Palestine at the UN General Assembly. Recognition didn’t change much on the ground, of course. The genocide continued unabated, and Israeli settlers in the West Bank continued to attack and kill Palestinians. But back in Canada there are indications, it has made a difference. A crack has now appeared in the Israel lobby’s door. Read more.

There are encouraging signs that Canada’s recognition of Palestine has opened a door to broader discussion of a topic the Zionist lobby has tried hard to keep closed.

Here are some examples.

On Friday, Oct 17th, CBC’s 5th estate ran a hard hitting documentary “Funding the Occupation” on Canadian charities using tax free funds to subsidize the activities of illegal settlers. It is available on youtube here:

It hit a nerve. The program was immediately attacked by the pro Israel propaganda group Honest Reporting Canada claiming CBC’s The Fifth Estate Turns Investigative Journalism Into Anti-Israel Propaganda.

Honest Reporting Canada’s ongoing series of “Action alerts” reveals a growing anxiety over many CBC articles and interviews on an array of reports including the Gaza Flotilla, protests in Vancouver, Chris Brown’s reference to “historic Palestinian lands”, and several others. (HINT: It’s worth subscribing to Honest Reporting Canada to see interesting articles you may have missed – and how worried they are over the pounding Israel is starting to get even in mainstream media.)

There is also a sign of “opening up” in other mainstream meadia. The Globe and Mail, Canada’s paper of record, has been historically sympathetic to Israel and demonized Palestinians resistance and Hamas in particular. But for several weeks in a row the Saturday Globe has had significant articles about the humanitarian situation in Gaza. On the 2nd anniversary of Hamas’ spectacular breakout, it ran a long opinion piece from Raja Khouri and Jeff Wilkinson humanizing Palestinians, entitled “As a Palestinian, this is what I wish the Jewish community could hear”.

Evolution on the Israel/Palestine file is also reflected in the increasingly hard-line taken by some student newspapers across Canada. An editorial in the McGill daily on the anniversary of October 7th said:

“Israel’s genocide in Gaza is the culmination of a century-long colonial project: one that began with the Balfour Declaration in 1917, (…) It started implementation in 1948 with the wave of ethnic cleansing known as the Nakba (“catastrophe” in Arabic). The indiscriminate killing of Palestinians in Gaza is not solely the policy of the current ruling party, but the core of Israeli policy from its foundation to the present day.

The McGill Daily has been a critic of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza for many years, but this editorial seeing the creation of Israel itself as a colonial project beginning in 1948, has moved well beyond simply “End the Occupation”.

There have also been some movements at the Canadian municipal level. Only 4 weeks after Carney’s announcement on recognition, Burnaby B.C. became the first municipality in Canada to call for a “full two-way arms embargo with Israel. The motion affirms Burnaby City Council’s “commitment to freedom, justice, and equality for the Palestinian people and all people, opposes all forms of racism, bigotry, discrimination, and oppression.

On October 7, the City of St. John’s passed a similar motion calling for a two-way arms embargo between Canada and Israel.

A crack in the door

None of these actions is a direct result of Carney’s move. But official recognition by Canada has opened up room for serious discussion about Palestine and Canada’s role in ignoring, or even supporting, the Israeli genocide. When our prime minister unequivocally declares that Netanyahu would be arrested if he travelled to Canada, it signals to those interested in human rights and international law that they are now backed by Canadian official policy and should keep on pushing that door ever wider.

When more Canadian municipalities pass legislation like those of Burnaby and St. John’s, when professional associations including teachers, doctors and nurses denounce the genocide, when Canadian sports associations refuse to play with Israeli sports teams, the Canadian government will have to listen and start to implement the “concrete actions” actions against Israel promised by Prime Minister Carney in his statement of May 19th.

The Israel lobby in Canada, including the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs saw this coming. They tried to stop Canadian recognition of Palestine claiming it would be a “reward for terrorism“. But the door is now open and they will have trouble shutting it.

11 comments

  1. Hi Peter, any word on NDP leadership interviews? I’d love to an in depth discussion (and also curious about other candidates willingness/responses)
    Best
    Y

    Get Outlook for iOShttps://aka.ms/o0ukef


  2. I am still waiting for the Globe & Mail editorial board to write an editorial supporting the recognition of the state of Palestine and condemning the genocide presently going on. I am not holding my breath. Thank you Peter for all you do to help the Palestinian people.

  3. HI Peter

    Excellent blog. We patiently wait for the ” concrete actions ” promised by the Prime Minister.

  4. Before we blame the Balfour declaration, we should read it. It is very short with the heart being two statements. The first uses “homeland” not “state”. The word “state” does not appear. The second says explicitly, “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine”. The second statement seems to have disappeared from the minds of those who cite the Balfour declaration as a basis for the creation of a new state. I blame those who deliberately distort the Balfour declaration, not the authors of that statement.

    1. Thanks,
      Most scholars think that the Balfour declaration was deliberately vague. It aimed to please the Zionists, who wanted “state\’, without inflmaming the rbs who would have been very hostile. Not the first tine in history that her majesty’s government was less than forthright about its intentions.

      1. We do not know, and probably will never know, what their actual intentions were. We have no choice but to assume that they meant what they said. This is especially true because those words were repeated in the League of Nations mandate. We can be sure that they did not say “state” and that they limited the effects of their “homeland” so that it would not damage the other residents. I believe that Israelis and their enablers deliberately distorted the meaning of those words. They never mention the second part of the declaration, words that are very clear and do not allow what happened.

  5. You titled “Hamas’ spectacular breakout” the events of the day when the highest number of jews had been slaughtered since the holocaust , that’s just sickening.

    over 1200 people, vast majority of them civilians, elderly, women and babies were massacred by Hamas and you call it “spectacular breakout”

    1. Hi Nadav, thanks for your comment. Did you watch my earlier webinar on Hamas and Israel which dealt with Oct 7th in some detail?

      My understanding is that of the 1200 Israelis were killed on Oct 7th, about 350 or so were soldiers. Attacking soldiers is perfectly legal in time of war.

      As far as the 850 or so Israeli civilians goes, i know that official Israeli claim is that they were all killed by Hamas.

      However, many sources, including Israeli sources like Haaretz, acknowledge that many Israeli civilians were killed by IDF forces – either in the cross fire or in application of the so called “Hannibal directive” which aims to prevent ANY Israeli from being taken hostage, EVEN IF IT RISKS KILLING THEM. HOw many is nt known. Only a few? or a majority? I dont know, although i do know that Israel uosed tanks and apache helicopters with hellfire missiles on crowds where it ws impossible to distinguish Hamas from Israelis.

      Immediately after Oct 7th, Hamas called for an independent inernational investigation of what happened. Israel refused to allow indopendent verifaction of its claims so exact numbers remain hidden.

Comments are closed.